AcreTrader vs Harvest Returns
Side-by-side comparison to help you decide which platform is right for your portfolio.
| Feature | AcreTrader | Harvest Returns |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating | 3.5 | 3.6✓ |
| Min. Investment | $10K | $5K✓ |
| Fee Rating | 2.5 | 5.0✓ |
| Liquidity | Illiquid | Illiquid |
| Accreditation | Required | Partial |
| Ease of Use | 4.0✓ | 3.2 |
| Transparency | 3.8✓ | 3.5 |
| Secondary Market | No | No |
| Mobile App | Yes | No |
AcreTrader Overview
AcreTrader is best suited for investors who want accredited investors seeking diversified farmland exposure through a passive online platform, with moderate to long-term investment horizon and comfort with illiquid assets. The platform, AcreTrader has built a growing investor base.
With a minimum investment of $10K, AcreTrader requires accredited investor status. The platform does not currently offer a secondary market and requires manual investment selection.
Key Strengths:
- Low minimum investment compared to direct farmland ($10,000+)
- Passive investment - AcreTrader handles all farm management and operations
- Strong historical returns (6-14% annually on permanent crops, IRRs reaching 30%+ in some cases)
- Diversification across multiple properties and crop types
Key Drawbacks:
- Requires accredited investor status (net worth or income restrictions)
- Illiquid investment - long hold periods typical
- Relatively new platform with most offerings not yet at end of hold period - limited full-cycle performance data
Harvest Returns Overview
Harvest Returns is best suited for investors who want accredited investors seeking exposure to agricultural assets with favorable fee structures; those willing to accept illiquidity for mission-aligned farmland investing; investors comfortable with alternative asset classes outside traditional securities markets. Founded in 2016 and headquartered in Fort Worth, TX, Harvest Returns manages $30 million raised (as of April 2023) in assets.
With a minimum investment of $5K, Harvest Returns offers some investments open to non-accredited investors. The platform does not currently offer a secondary market and requires manual investment selection.
Key Strengths:
- No annual fees or management fees charged to investors
- Low minimum investment ($5,000) compared to many alternative investments
- Diversified agricultural portfolio including farmland, timberland, livestock, specialty crops, and agritech
- Strong historical returns averaging 9.8% annually on private credit offerings since 2019
Key Drawbacks:
- Illiquid investments with no secondary market to sell shares
- Requires accreditation for most deals (some Rule 506b exceptions)
- No mobile app for portfolio management or monitoring
Head-to-Head Comparison
Fees & Costs
AcreTrader carries a fee rating of 2.5/5, with fees structured as: 0.75% annual servicing fee; 2-5% upfront closing costs; Performance: 5% upon sale of shares. Harvest Returns scores 5.0/5 on fees, charging: No annual fees charged to investors.
Edge: Harvest Returns. More competitive fee structure overall.
Minimum Investment
AcreTrader requires $10K to get started, while Harvest Returns requires $5K. Harvest Returns's lower minimum makes it more accessible for new investors.
Edge: Harvest Returns. Lower barrier to entry.
Accreditation Requirements
AcreTrader requires accreditation. Harvest Returns partially requires accreditation.
Edge: Tie. Similar accreditation requirements.
Liquidity
AcreTrader offers illiquid investments. Harvest Returns provides illiquid investments.
Edge: Tie. Similar liquidity profiles.
Ease of Use
AcreTrader scores 4.0/5 for ease of use and offers a mobile app. Harvest Returns scores 3.2/5.
Edge: AcreTrader. Better overall user experience.
Transparency
AcreTrader earns a 3.8/5 transparency rating. Harvest Returns scores 3.5/5.
Edge: AcreTrader. More transparent reporting and disclosures.
Who Should Choose AcreTrader?
AcreTrader is the better choice if you:
- Are comfortable with a $10K minimum investment
- Meet accredited investor requirements and want premium deal flow
- Want exposure to diversified real estate portfolios
- Prefer to hand-pick your investments
Who Should Choose Harvest Returns?
Harvest Returns is the better choice if you:
- Are comfortable with a $5K minimum investment
- Meet accredited investor requirements and want institutional-quality deals
- Want exposure to specific real estate deals or projects
- Prefer to hand-pick your investments
Verdict
Winner: Harvest Returns. With 3.6/5 overall rating versus AcreTrader's 3.5/5, Harvest Returns edges ahead with a lower minimum investment and better fees. That said, AcreTrader may be the better fit if you specifically need accredited investors seeking diversified farmland exposure through a passive onl.
For most investors exploring alternatives, we recommend starting with Harvest Returns — but consider your specific goals before committing.
FAQ
Is AcreTrader or Harvest Returns better for beginners?
Harvest Returns is generally more beginner-friendly with its $5K minimum investment compared to AcreTrader's $10K.
Can I use both AcreTrader and Harvest Returns?
Yes. Many alternative investment portfolios benefit from diversification across platforms. AcreTrader and Harvest Returns overlap in some asset classes but may offer different deal structures, fee models, and investment approaches.
Which platform has better returns?
Historical returns vary by specific investment and time period. Harvest Returns has a higher overall rating, but past performance doesn't guarantee future results. Both platforms provide different risk-return profiles depending on the specific offerings you choose.
Are AcreTrader and Harvest Returns safe?
Both platforms are legitimate, regulated investment services. AcreTrader is regulated by SEC (Regulation D Rule 506(c)), FINRA, SIPC. Harvest Returns is regulated by SEC (private placement syndications under Regulation D), FINRA (via broker-dealer partner North Capital Private Securities). As with all alternative investments, there is inherent risk — these are generally illiquid, long-term investments and not FDIC insured.
AcreTrader Asset Classes
Harvest Returns Asset Classes
AcreTrader
Pros
- +Low minimum investment compared to direct farmland ($10,000+)
- +Passive investment - AcreTrader handles all farm management and operations
- +Strong historical returns (6-14% annually on permanent crops, IRRs reaching 30%+ in some cases)
- +Diversification across multiple properties and crop types
Cons
- −Requires accredited investor status (net worth or income restrictions)
- −Illiquid investment - long hold periods typical
- −Relatively new platform with most offerings not yet at end of hold period - limited full-cycle performance data
- −Multiple fee layers (0.75% annual + 5% on sale + 2-5% upfront closing costs) erode returns
Harvest Returns
Pros
- +No annual fees or management fees charged to investors
- +Low minimum investment ($5,000) compared to many alternative investments
- +Diversified agricultural portfolio including farmland, timberland, livestock, specialty crops, and agritech
- +Strong historical returns averaging 9.8% annually on private credit offerings since 2019
Cons
- −Illiquid investments with no secondary market to sell shares
- −Requires accreditation for most deals (some Rule 506b exceptions)
- −No mobile app for portfolio management or monitoring
- −Limited liquidity features; some deals allow eventual share buyback but not guaranteed
Disclaimer: ModernAlts is an independent research platform. We may receive compensation from platforms we review. Nothing on this site constitutes investment, legal, or tax advice. Alternative investments involve risk including possible loss of principal. Past performance is not indicative of future results.