ModernAlts

AcreTrader vs Steward

Side-by-side comparison to help you decide which platform is right for your portfolio.

FeatureAcreTraderSteward
Overall Rating3.53.6
Min. Investment$10K$100
Fee Rating2.54.8
LiquidityIlliquidSemi-liquid
AccreditationRequiredPartial
Ease of Use4.03.2
Transparency3.82.8
Secondary MarketNoNo
Mobile AppYesNo

AcreTrader Overview

AcreTrader is best suited for investors who want accredited investors seeking diversified farmland exposure through a passive online platform, with moderate to long-term investment horizon and comfort with illiquid assets. The platform, AcreTrader has built a growing investor base.

With a minimum investment of $10K, AcreTrader requires accredited investor status. The platform does not currently offer a secondary market and requires manual investment selection.

Key Strengths:

  • Low minimum investment compared to direct farmland ($10,000+)
  • Passive investment - AcreTrader handles all farm management and operations
  • Strong historical returns (6-14% annually on permanent crops, IRRs reaching 30%+ in some cases)
  • Diversification across multiple properties and crop types

Key Drawbacks:

  • Requires accredited investor status (net worth or income restrictions)
  • Illiquid investment - long hold periods typical
  • Relatively new platform with most offerings not yet at end of hold period - limited full-cycle performance data

Steward Overview

Steward is best suited for investors who want impact-focused investors seeking exposure to sustainable agriculture with moderate liquidity needs and modest capital ($100+). Best suited for those comfortable with 4-6 year project commitments or seeking shorter-term bridge financing options. Ideal for investors who value environmental/regenerative farming practices and want retail access to agricultural lending.. Founded in 2016 and headquartered in Maryland, USA, Steward has built a growing investor base.

With a minimum investment of $100, Steward offers some investments open to non-accredited investors. The platform does not currently offer a secondary market and requires manual investment selection.

Key Strengths:

  • Low minimum investment of $100 allows retail participation in agricultural lending
  • No fees charged to lenders - transparent fee structure where borrowers cover servicing
  • Competitive fixed returns: 7.5% annual for diversified Steward Regenerative Capital pool with monthly payments
  • Founder has proven fintech/real estate crowdfunding track record (Fundrise co-founder)

Key Drawbacks:

  • Limited operating history - founded 2016, relatively young platform for agricultural lending
  • No dedicated mobile app - web-only access limits convenience for active monitoring
  • Rule 506(b) offering means limited marketing and smaller investor base

Head-to-Head Comparison

Fees & Costs

AcreTrader carries a fee rating of 2.5/5, with fees structured as: 0.75% annual servicing fee; 2-5% upfront closing costs; Performance: 5% upon sale of shares. Steward scores 4.8/5 on fees, charging: 0.5% servicing fee (charged to borrowers, not lenders).

Edge: Steward. More competitive fee structure overall.

Minimum Investment

AcreTrader requires $10K to get started, while Steward requires $100. Steward's lower minimum makes it more accessible for new investors.

Edge: Steward. Lower barrier to entry.

Accreditation Requirements

AcreTrader requires accreditation. Steward partially requires accreditation.

Edge: Tie. Similar accreditation requirements.

Liquidity

AcreTrader offers illiquid investments. Steward provides semi-liquid investments.

Edge: Tie. Similar liquidity profiles.

Ease of Use

AcreTrader scores 4.0/5 for ease of use and offers a mobile app. Steward scores 3.2/5.

Edge: AcreTrader. Better overall user experience.

Transparency

AcreTrader earns a 3.8/5 transparency rating. Steward scores 2.8/5.

Edge: AcreTrader. More transparent reporting and disclosures.


Who Should Choose AcreTrader?

AcreTrader is the better choice if you:

  • Are comfortable with a $10K minimum investment
  • Meet accredited investor requirements and want premium deal flow
  • Want exposure to diversified real estate portfolios
  • Prefer to hand-pick your investments

Who Should Choose Steward?

Steward is the better choice if you:

  • Want to start investing with a low minimum
  • Meet accredited investor requirements and want institutional-quality deals
  • Are interested in farmland, private credit as an asset class
  • Prefer to hand-pick your investments

Verdict

Winner: Steward. With 3.6/5 overall rating versus AcreTrader's 3.5/5, Steward edges ahead with a lower minimum investment and better fees. That said, AcreTrader may be the better fit if you specifically need accredited investors seeking diversified farmland exposure through a passive onl.

For most investors exploring alternatives, we recommend starting with Steward — but consider your specific goals before committing.


FAQ

Is AcreTrader or Steward better for beginners?

Steward is generally more beginner-friendly with its $100 minimum investment compared to AcreTrader's $10K.

Can I use both AcreTrader and Steward?

Yes. Many alternative investment portfolios benefit from diversification across platforms. AcreTrader and Steward overlap in some asset classes but may offer different deal structures, fee models, and investment approaches.

Which platform has better returns?

Historical returns vary by specific investment and time period. Steward has a higher overall rating, but past performance doesn't guarantee future results. Both platforms provide different risk-return profiles depending on the specific offerings you choose.

Are AcreTrader and Steward safe?

Both platforms are legitimate, regulated investment services. AcreTrader is regulated by SEC (Regulation D Rule 506(c)), FINRA, SIPC. Steward is regulated by SEC Rule 506(b) - Regulation D exempt offering. As with all alternative investments, there is inherent risk — these are generally illiquid, long-term investments and not FDIC insured.

AcreTrader Asset Classes

FarmlandReal Estate

Steward Asset Classes

FarmlandPrivate Credit

AcreTrader

Pros

  • +Low minimum investment compared to direct farmland ($10,000+)
  • +Passive investment - AcreTrader handles all farm management and operations
  • +Strong historical returns (6-14% annually on permanent crops, IRRs reaching 30%+ in some cases)
  • +Diversification across multiple properties and crop types

Cons

  • Requires accredited investor status (net worth or income restrictions)
  • Illiquid investment - long hold periods typical
  • Relatively new platform with most offerings not yet at end of hold period - limited full-cycle performance data
  • Multiple fee layers (0.75% annual + 5% on sale + 2-5% upfront closing costs) erode returns

Steward

Pros

  • +Low minimum investment of $100 allows retail participation in agricultural lending
  • +No fees charged to lenders - transparent fee structure where borrowers cover servicing
  • +Competitive fixed returns: 7.5% annual for diversified Steward Regenerative Capital pool with monthly payments
  • +Founder has proven fintech/real estate crowdfunding track record (Fundrise co-founder)

Cons

  • Limited operating history - founded 2016, relatively young platform for agricultural lending
  • No dedicated mobile app - web-only access limits convenience for active monitoring
  • Rule 506(b) offering means limited marketing and smaller investor base
  • Accreditation required for equity investments, limiting access for non-accredited investors

AcreTrader

3.5/5 overall

Steward

3.6/5 overall

Disclaimer: ModernAlts is an independent research platform. We may receive compensation from platforms we review. Nothing on this site constitutes investment, legal, or tax advice. Alternative investments involve risk including possible loss of principal. Past performance is not indicative of future results.