ModernAlts

EquityZen vs Yieldstreet

Side-by-side comparison to help you decide which platform is right for your portfolio.

FeatureEquityZenYieldstreet
Overall Rating3.83.9
Min. Investment$5K$2.5K
Fee Rating3.53.0
LiquiditySemi-liquidIlliquid
AccreditationRequiredPartial
Ease of Use3.54.0
Transparency4.03.5
Secondary MarketYesNo
Mobile AppYesYes

Yieldstreet Overview

Yieldstreet is best suited for investors who want accredited investors seeking diversified alternative asset exposure with moderate to high risk tolerance; non-accredited investors interested in passive alternative income through the Prism Fund. Founded in 2015 and headquartered in New York, NY, Yieldstreet has built a growing investor base.

With a minimum investment of $2.5K, Yieldstreet offers some investments open to non-accredited investors. The platform does not currently offer a secondary market and supports auto-invest features.

Key Strengths:

  • Offers 10+ alternative asset classes including art, real estate, venture capital, and private credit on single platform
  • Prism Fund available to non-accredited investors with lower $2,500 minimum investment
  • Historical net annualized return of 7.4% since 2015 outperforms traditional stock/bond portfolios
  • Willow 360 automated investing solution provides diversified portfolio management across three professional fund managers

Key Drawbacks:

  • Not accredited by Better Business Bureau and receives lackluster reviews with positive feedback primarily from 2022 and earlier
  • Individual offerings require accredited investor status with net worth exceeding $1 million
  • Management fees range from 0% to 2.5% annually plus additional originator and administrative fees

EquityZen Overview

EquityZen is best suited for investors who want accredited investors seeking early-stage venture exposure through a regulated secondary marketplace, with $5,000+ to invest and medium to long-term holding horizons. Best for those comfortable with illiquidity and interested in pre-IPO gains before public market entry.. Founded in 2013 and headquartered in New York, NY (30 Broad Street), EquityZen has built a growing investor base.

With a minimum investment of $5K, EquityZen requires accredited investor status. The platform offers a secondary market for early liquidity and requires manual investment selection.

Key Strengths:

  • Access to pre-IPO growth opportunities at earlier valuations
  • Regulated broker-dealer platform with SEC, FINRA, and SIPC oversight
  • Curated selection of well-known late-stage private companies
  • Competitive fee structure after February 2026 reduction to 2.5%

Key Drawbacks:

  • Transaction fees of 2.5% on buys and sells add up for active traders
  • Accreditation requirement limits access to high net worth/income individuals
  • Lock-up periods after IPO prevent immediate share sales

Head-to-Head Comparison

Fees & Costs

Yieldstreet carries a fee rating of 3.0/5, with fees structured as: 0% to 2.5% annually depending on offering; 1.25% for Yieldstreet 360 managed portfolios; Performance: varies by offering. EquityZen scores 3.5/5 on fees, charging: 2.5% buy and sell side (reduced from 5% as of February 2026).

Edge: EquityZen. More competitive fee structure overall.

Minimum Investment

Yieldstreet requires $2.5K to get started, while EquityZen requires $5K. Yieldstreet's lower minimum makes it more accessible for new investors.

Edge: Yieldstreet. Lower barrier to entry.

Accreditation Requirements

Yieldstreet partially requires accreditation. EquityZen requires accreditation.

Edge: Tie. Similar accreditation requirements.

Liquidity

Yieldstreet offers illiquid investments. EquityZen provides semi-liquid investments with a secondary market.

Edge: EquityZen. Secondary market provides more flexibility.

Ease of Use

Yieldstreet scores 4.0/5 for ease of use and offers a mobile app. EquityZen scores 3.5/5 and also has a mobile app.

Edge: Yieldstreet. Better overall user experience.

Transparency

Yieldstreet earns a 3.5/5 transparency rating. EquityZen scores 4.0/5.

Edge: EquityZen. More transparent reporting and disclosures.


Who Should Choose Yieldstreet?

Yieldstreet is the better choice if you:

  • Are comfortable with a $2.5K minimum investment
  • Meet accredited investor requirements and want premium deal flow
  • Want exposure to diversified real estate portfolios
  • Prefer a hands-off, auto-invest approach

Who Should Choose EquityZen?

EquityZen is the better choice if you:

  • Are comfortable with a $5K minimum investment
  • Meet accredited investor requirements and want institutional-quality deals
  • Are interested in venture as an asset class
  • Prefer to hand-pick your investments
  • Value the option to sell holdings before maturity

Verdict

Winner: Yieldstreet. With 3.9/5 overall rating versus EquityZen's 3.8/5, Yieldstreet edges ahead with a lower minimum investment and a stronger overall package. That said, EquityZen may be the better fit if you specifically need accredited investors seeking early-stage venture exposure through a regulated se.

For most investors exploring alternatives, we recommend starting with Yieldstreet — but consider your specific goals before committing.


FAQ

Is Yieldstreet or EquityZen better for beginners?

Yieldstreet is generally more beginner-friendly with its $2.5K minimum investment compared to EquityZen's $5K.

Can I use both Yieldstreet and EquityZen?

Yes. Many alternative investment portfolios benefit from diversification across platforms. Yieldstreet and EquityZen overlap in some asset classes but may offer different deal structures, fee models, and investment approaches.

Which platform has better returns?

Historical returns vary by specific investment and time period. Yieldstreet has a higher overall rating, but past performance doesn't guarantee future results. Both platforms provide different risk-return profiles depending on the specific offerings you choose.

Are Yieldstreet and EquityZen safe?

Both platforms are legitimate, regulated investment services. Yieldstreet is regulated by SEC. EquityZen is regulated by SEC, FINRA, SIPC. As with all alternative investments, there is inherent risk — these are generally illiquid, long-term investments and not FDIC insured.

EquityZen Asset Classes

Venture

Yieldstreet Asset Classes

Real EstateArtVenturePrivate EquityPrivate Credit

EquityZen

Pros

  • +Access to pre-IPO growth opportunities at earlier valuations
  • +Regulated broker-dealer platform with SEC, FINRA, and SIPC oversight
  • +Curated selection of well-known late-stage private companies
  • +Competitive fee structure after February 2026 reduction to 2.5%

Cons

  • Transaction fees of 2.5% on buys and sells add up for active traders
  • Accreditation requirement limits access to high net worth/income individuals
  • Lock-up periods after IPO prevent immediate share sales
  • High minimum investment of $5,000-$10,000 and $20,000 for curated funds

Yieldstreet

Pros

  • +Offers 10+ alternative asset classes including art, real estate, venture capital, and private credit on single platform
  • +Prism Fund available to non-accredited investors with lower $2,500 minimum investment
  • +Historical net annualized return of 7.4% since 2015 outperforms traditional stock/bond portfolios
  • +Willow 360 automated investing solution provides diversified portfolio management across three professional fund managers

Cons

  • Not accredited by Better Business Bureau and receives lackluster reviews with positive feedback primarily from 2022 and earlier
  • Individual offerings require accredited investor status with net worth exceeding $1 million
  • Management fees range from 0% to 2.5% annually plus additional originator and administrative fees
  • Most investments are illiquid with limited secondary market for early exits

EquityZen

3.8/5 overall

Yieldstreet

3.9/5 overall

Disclaimer: ModernAlts is an independent research platform. We may receive compensation from platforms we review. Nothing on this site constitutes investment, legal, or tax advice. Alternative investments involve risk including possible loss of principal. Past performance is not indicative of future results.