FarmTogether vs Steward

FarmTogether Overview

FarmTogether is best suited for investors who want accredited investors seeking long-term farmland exposure with moderate to high returns, comfortable with 5-12 year holding periods and illiquid investments. The platform, FarmTogether has built a growing investor base.

With a minimum investment of $15K, FarmTogether requires accredited investor status. The platform does not currently offer a secondary market and requires manual investment selection.

Key Strengths:

• Low minimum investment for accredited investors ($15,000 for crowdfunded offerings)
• Diversified farmland portfolio across multiple regions and crop types
• Professional management of farm operations and property maintenance
• Potential returns of 7-13% after fees on most offerings

Key Drawbacks:

• Accreditation requirement limits access to only qualified investors
• High liquidity constraints with holding periods of 5-12 years
• Limited transparency on historical performance; platform relies on forward-looking projections

---

Steward Overview

Steward is best suited for investors who want impact-focused investors seeking exposure to sustainable agriculture with moderate liquidity needs and modest capital ($100+). Best suited for those comfortable with 4-6 year project commitments or seeking shorter-term bridge financing options. Ideal for investors who value environmental/regenerative farming practices and want retail access to agricultural lending.. Founded in 2016 and headquartered in Maryland, USA, Steward has built a growing investor base.

With a minimum investment of $100, Steward offers some investments open to non-accredited investors. The platform does not currently offer a secondary market and requires manual investment selection.

Key Strengths:

• Low minimum investment of $100 allows retail participation in agricultural lending
• No fees charged to lenders - transparent fee structure where borrowers cover servicing
• Competitive fixed returns: 7.5% annual for diversified Steward Regenerative Capital pool with monthly payments
• Founder has proven fintech/real estate crowdfunding track record (Fundrise co-founder)

Key Drawbacks:

• Limited operating history - founded 2016, relatively young platform for agricultural lending
• No dedicated mobile app - web-only access limits convenience for active monitoring
• Rule 506(b) offering means limited marketing and smaller investor base

---

Head-to-Head Comparison

Fees & Costs

FarmTogether carries a fee rating of 2.5/5, with fees structured as: 1-2% annual; Performance: 5% net operating income (permanent crop) or 20% gross rent (row crop). Steward scores 4.8/5 on fees, charging: 0.5% servicing fee (charged to borrowers, not lenders).

Edge: Steward. More competitive fee structure overall.

Minimum Investment

FarmTogether requires $15K to get started, while Steward requires $100. Steward's lower minimum makes it more accessible for new investors.

Edge: Steward. Lower barrier to entry.

Accreditation Requirements

FarmTogether requires accreditation. Steward partially requires accreditation.

Edge: Tie. Similar accreditation requirements.

Liquidity

FarmTogether offers illiquid investments. Steward provides semi-liquid investments.

Edge: Tie. Similar liquidity profiles.

Ease of Use

FarmTogether scores 3.0/5 for ease of use. Steward scores 3.2/5.

Edge: Steward. Better overall user experience.

Transparency

FarmTogether earns a 2.5/5 transparency rating. Steward scores 2.8/5.

Edge: Steward. More transparent reporting and disclosures.

---

Who Should Choose FarmTogether?

FarmTogether is the better choice if you:

• Are comfortable with a $15K minimum investment
• Meet accredited investor requirements and want premium deal flow
• Want exposure to diversified real estate portfolios
• Prefer to hand-pick your investments

Who Should Choose Steward?

Steward is the better choice if you:

• Want to start investing with a low minimum
• Meet accredited investor requirements and want institutional-quality deals
• Are interested in farmland, private credit as an asset class
• Prefer to hand-pick your investments

---

Verdict

Winner: Steward. With 3.6/5 overall rating versus FarmTogether's 3.3/5, Steward edges ahead with a lower minimum investment and better fees. That said, FarmTogether may be the better fit if you specifically need accredited investors seeking long-term farmland exposure with moderate to high r.

For most investors exploring alternatives, we recommend starting with Steward — but consider your specific goals before committing.

---

FAQ

Is FarmTogether or Steward better for beginners?

Steward is generally more beginner-friendly with its $100 minimum investment compared to FarmTogether's $15K.

Can I use both FarmTogether and Steward?

Yes. Many alternative investment portfolios benefit from diversification across platforms. FarmTogether and Steward overlap in some asset classes but may offer different deal structures, fee models, and investment approaches.

Which platform has better returns?

Historical returns vary by specific investment and time period. Steward has a higher overall rating, but past performance doesn't guarantee future results. Both platforms provide different risk-return profiles depending on the specific offerings you choose.

Are FarmTogether and Steward safe?

Both platforms are legitimate, regulated investment services. FarmTogether is regulated by SEC (Exempt Reporting Adviser, CRD # 304511, SEC # 802-117227). Steward is regulated by SEC Rule 506(b) - Regulation D exempt offering. As with all alternative investments, there is inherent risk — these are generally illiquid, long-term investments and not FDIC insured.